Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
lifewithalazydazerv · Life With A Lazy Daze RV
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Revised C.C.C. calculations   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #98560 of 107443 |
Re: Revised C.C.C. calculations

"The RV.NET discussion I referred to, Andy, revolves around this
document where the NHTSA became involved in the definitions of CCC..."

Thanks for the clarification, Ed! I read that rv.net thread several
times and *thought* I'd followed all the links, but somehow I missed
the one to the 26-page NHTSA rulemaking.

Meanwhile, this reply from Steve Newton at Lazy Daze confirms what you
said:

"The previous weight standards and weight labels were mandated by
RVIA. All RVIA members were required to post labels in each coach
using their format. However last year NHTSA determined that since not
all RV manufacturers are in RVIA they wanted to level the playing
field. Consequently, they mandated their own standards which apply to
all manufacturers. Their requirements are completely different than
the now defunct RVIA standard previously in use."

I question the argument that the new system more accurately reflects
the way we used to do the calculations. Before, you took the CCC and
subtracted 154 pounds times the number of unoccupied seats. Now, you
take the CCC and add 154 pounds times the number of *occupied* seats.
Similarly, if you travel with a half-empty water tank, you used to add
the weight of half a tank of water to the CCC. Now you subtract it.
You're doing exactly the same calculations--just changing plus to
minus and vice versa. There's no advantage to the consumer that I can see.

There's a big advantage to the RV industry, though: the new NHTSA
rules allow them to revise their CCC numbers drastically upward,
without doing a thing to improve the actual cargo capacities. ;-) Lazy
Daze didn't need any help in that regard, but some RVs from other
makers had CCC numbers so pathetic that they'd do anything to conceal
them. Now they won't have to try as hard. In fact, popup camper
manufacturers won't have to try at all: as I read the new NHTSA rules,
they're exempted from posting CCCs. I'll bet they love that!

I suggested to Steve that it would be a good idea to add a note to the
2009 LD datasheet, explaining that the CCC numbers have changed but
the cargo capacity hasn't. Otherwise people who are trying to decide
between buying a used 2008 and a new 2009 are going to get a VERY
wrong impression. :-(

Andy Baird
http://www.andybaird.com/travels/




Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:19 pm

andybaird2000
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #98560 of 107443 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Recently there was some discussion of the new LD CCC numbers. This discussion on RV.NET may explain the change. ...
Ed
etdcaw
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2009
6:28 pm

"Recently there was some discussion of the new LD CCC numbers. This discussion on RV.NET may explain the change." As far as I can see, that discussion just...
Andy Baird
andybaird2000
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2009
10:47 pm

... The RV.NET discussion I referred to, Andy, revolves around this document where the NHTSA became involved in the definitions of CCC in order to get some...
Ed
etdcaw
Offline Send Email
Jan 13, 2009
11:30 pm

"The RV.NET discussion I referred to, Andy, revolves around this document where the NHTSA became involved in the definitions of CCC..." Thanks for the...
Andy Baird
andybaird2000
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2009
5:19 pm

... Speaking as a person who travels alone and weighs less than (154 x 4 = ) 616 pounds (but, alas, more than 154) it makes sense to me to factor-in the actual...
joanne0012
Offline Send Email
Jan 15, 2009
7:13 pm

... I agree with your assessment. And boy can bureaucratic documents be tough to wade through! The NHTSA has specified new labeling requirements. Water and...
older_fossil
Offline
Jan 14, 2009
5:25 pm

Thanks, Ed, I read it too and your interpretation matches mine. I think the NHTSA approach makes sense and mirrors the way most of us did head calculations...
gwa1225@...
gwa1225
Offline Send Email
Jan 14, 2009
4:14 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help