From: no1poley <no1poley@...>
Subject: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 7:48 AM

How are the retirees affected by the "agreement" of Washington to avoid the debt default?

I am relying upon you Jim, to break it down for us.

Has Flytyer and his "boys" put it to us once again?

No COLA for three [3] years also?

 

 

God Bless Yall
Poley and Geraldine
06 Tour 40 FD
Dallas, Georgia [for now]

The link below will point out is the first place they need to start when doing cuts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7XA2UUpXRk

From: Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 11:25 AM

 

    Obama, Reed and Pelosi have put us in the position of someone who brings in $6,000 a month but their total payments are $10,000 a month and the only way they know to handle the situation is go borrow another $4,000 a month which simply raises the payments next month.

    They might not be able to shed the debt but they could start selling stuff to balance the budget. That would be things like the millions of acres of federal land, much of which was bought in the past two years by the defense department, interior department, agriculture department and who knows who else. So it has to go at fire sale prices, at least it's going back into a productive state and one which would pay taxes to the states.

    The other would be to dum all those frivilous things they support like the energy department, commerce department, railroad commission, education department and others like that which do absolutely nothing constructive. Do away with the Homeland Security department and turn that over to the military.

    The final one would be to immediately stop all payments to things like ACORN, New Black Panthers, hundres of Community Action groups, all of which produce nothing but votes to keep the money flowing to them. Pretty soon we would find ourselves able to make our payments without borrowing more money.

 

Jim

---

From: thomas leahy <tplvalue@...>

At first glance, this does not look good. Depends a lot on who gets put on the"commission" to figure out things later. Rinos and dems and it will be all over. Most talked about cuts are 2013 at earliest. And since one congress cannot bind a future one, a cut need not happen. 2012 election will be the MOST IMPORTANT in our lifetime. Not only for president but for smaller government proponents in both houses. Otherwise it is circle the wagons in the hinterland...................

 

 

These glorious insults are from an era before the English language got boiled down to 4-letter words..   ·    A member of Parliament to Disraeli: "Sir, you will either die on the gallows or of some unspeakable disease." ·    "That depends, Sir," said Disraeli, "whether I embrace your policies or your mistress."   ·    "He had delusions of adequacy." - Walter Kerr   ·    "He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." - Winston Churchill   ·    "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."  Clarence Darrow   ·    "He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary." - William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway).   ·    "Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I'll waste no time reading it." - Moses Hadas   ·    "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain   ·    "He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends.." - Oscar Wilde   ·    "I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend, if you have one." - George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill ·    "Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second ... if there is one." -  Winston Churchill, in response.   ·    "I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here." - Stephen Bishop   ·    "He is a self-made man and worships his creator." - John Bright   ·    "I've just learned about his illness. Let's hope it's nothing trivial." - Irvin S. Cobb   ·    "He is not only dull himself; he is the cause of dullness in others." - Samuel Johnson   ·    "He is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up." - Paul Keating   ·    "In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily." - Charles, Count Talleyrand   ·    "He loves nature in spite of what it did to him." - Forrest Tucker   ·    "Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it?" - Mark Twain   ·    "His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork." - Mae West   ·    "Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." - Oscar Wilde   ·    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)   ·    "He has Van Gogh's ear for music." - Billy Wilder   ·    "I've had a perfectly wonderful evening.  But this wasn't it." - Groucho Marx

____________________________________________________________
57 Year Old Mom Looks 27!
Mom Reveals $5 Wrinkle Trick That Has Angered Doctors!
ConsumerLifestyles.org

From: scibreck@... <scibreck@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] Out of State registrations -- LLC
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 4:32 PM

Peter

Registering in Montana by forming an LLC through somebody like Bennett Law Firm in Missoula has saved me 10's of thousands of dollars.  No sales tax and plates are only $125 per year and they charge a fee of $125 per year as your registered agent.

scibreck@...

 

 

 

 

 

In a message dated 8/1/2011 12:30:42 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, jimfore28@... writes:

 

Sorry Peter but that's such a nebulous question that a logical answer is impossible. What taxes are you trying to avoid?

 

Jim

---

From: Shutterhappy <peter@...>
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, August 1, 2011 8:53:09 AM
Subject: [RVbasics] Out of State registrations -- LLC

I'm new to this but am wondering if any is registering their RV as an LLC through a no-sales-tax state like MT. 

I am considering whether this would work for me.  Any experiences to share?

thanks in advance,

Peter

From: Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 2:45 PM

    Sorry to break the news to you but you can forget about any COLAs ever again. Those adjustments were supposed to keep those on SS from losing ground on the economy but they never kept up with the actual inflation (even the big ones during the Jimmy Carter years)

    We have lost close to 10% in just the past three years without a whimper but think of the screaming that would have gone on had they simply reduced the SS payments by that same amount. Not only no more COLAs but they keep raising the fees for Medicare which is simply a way of transferring a cut from one end of the rope to the other.

 

Jim 

---

From: no1poley <no1poley@...>

How are the retirees affected by the "agreement" of Washington to avoid the debt default?

I am relying upon you Jim, to break it down for us.

Has Flytyer and his "boys" put it to us once again?

No COLA for three [3] years also?

 

God Bless Yall
Poley and Geraldine
06 Tour 40 FD
Dallas, Georgia [for now]

From: tmehrkam@... <tmehrkam@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 1:04 PM

The link below will point out is the first place they need to start when doing cuts. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7XA2UUpXRk   --- On Mon, 8/1/11, Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...> wrote: From: Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...> Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 11:25 AM       Obama, Reed and Pelosi have put us in the position of someone who brings in $6,000 a month but their total payments are $10,000 a month and the only way they know to handle the situation is go borrow another $4,000 a month which simply raises the payments next month.     They might not be able to shed the debt but they could start selling stuff to balance the budget. That would be things like the millions of acres of federal land, much of which was bought in the past two years by the defense department, interior department, agriculture department and who knows who else. So it has to go at fire sale prices, at least it's going back into a productive state and one which would pay taxes to the states.     The other would be to dum all those frivilous things they support like the energy department, commerce department, railroad commission, education department and others like that which do absolutely nothing constructive. Do away with the Homeland Security department and turn that over to the military.     The final one would be to immediately stop all payments to things like ACORN, New Black Panthers, hundres of Community Action groups, all of which produce nothing but votes to keep the money flowing to them. Pretty soon we would find ourselves able to make our payments without borrowing more money.   Jim From: thomas leahy <tplvalue@...> At first glance, this does not look good. Depends a lot on who gets put on the"commission" to figure out things later. Rinos and dems and it will be all over. Most talked about cuts are 2013 at earliest. And since one congress cannot bind a future one, a cut need not happen. 2012 election will be the MOST IMPORTANT in our lifetime. Not only for president but for smaller government proponents in both houses. Otherwise it is circle the wagons in the hinterland...................

From: Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 12:25 PM

    Obama, Reed and Pelosi have put us in the position of someone who brings in $6,000 a month but their total payments are $10,000 a month and the only way they know to handle the situation is go borrow another $4,000 a month which simply raises the payments next month.

    They might not be able to shed the debt but they could start selling stuff to balance the budget. That would be things like the millions of acres of federal land, much of which was bought in the past two years by the defense department, interior department, agriculture department and who knows who else. So it has to go at fire sale prices, at least it's going back into a productive state and one which would pay taxes to the states.

    The other would be to dum all those frivilous things they support like the energy department, commerce department, railroad commission, education department and others like that which do absolutely nothing constructive. Do away with the Homeland Security department and turn that over to the military.

    The final one would be to immediately stop all payments to things like ACORN, New Black Panthers, hundres of Community Action groups, all of which produce nothing but votes to keep the money flowing to them. Pretty soon we would find ourselves able to make our payments without borrowing more money.

 

Jim

---

From: thomas leahy <tplvalue@...>

At first glance, this does not look good. Depends a lot on who gets put on the"commission" to figure out things later. Rinos and dems and it will be all over. Most talked about cuts are 2013 at earliest. And since one congress cannot bind a future one, a cut need not happen. 2012 election will be the MOST IMPORTANT in our lifetime. Not only for president but for smaller government proponents in both houses. Otherwise it is circle the wagons in the hinterland...................

 

From: Jim Foreman <jimfore28@...>
Subject: Re: [RVbasics] question
To: RVbasics@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 1, 2011, 12:25 PM

    Obama, Reed and Pelosi have put us in the position of someone who brings in $6,000 a month but their total payments are $10,000 a month and the only way they know to handle the situation is go borrow another $4,000 a month which simply raises the payments next month.

    They might not be able to shed the debt but they could start selling stuff to balance the budget. That would be things like the millions of acres of federal land, much of which was bought in the past two years by the defense department, interior department, agriculture department and who knows who else. So it has to go at fire sale prices, at least it's going back into a productive state and one which would pay taxes to the states.

    The other would be to dum all those frivilous things they support like the energy department, commerce department, railroad commission, education department and others like that which do absolutely nothing constructive. Do away with the Homeland Security department and turn that over to the military.

    The final one would be to immediately stop all payments to things like ACORN, New Black Panthers, hundres of Community Action groups, all of which produce nothing but votes to keep the money flowing to them. Pretty soon we would find ourselves able to make our payments without borrowing more money.

 

Jim

---

From: thomas leahy <tplvalue@...>

At first glance, this does not look good. Depends a lot on who gets put on the"commission" to figure out things later. Rinos and dems and it will be all over. Most talked about cuts are 2013 at earliest. And since one congress cannot bind a future one, a cut need not happen. 2012 election will be the MOST IMPORTANT in our lifetime. Not only for president but for smaller government proponents in both houses. Otherwise it is circle the wagons in the hinterland...................