Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Locost_Theory · Forum for theoretical discussion of construction and modification of Lotus 7 type sports cars and related specials.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
LoCost Emissions Solution (TX and elsewhere)   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #6470 of 6516 |
The point about using '70's & '80's engines works well for simplicity, ease of
service, and Locost: the major concern is that of emissions standards. I have
not checked for prior mention of propane fuel in this group, but I can recommend
it beyond the emissions issue for the sake of engine life, reliability, a
customary 10% discount in price, and general availability- every town has a
propane outlet somewhere. I speak from the experience as the owner of a 1964
Ford Econoline van that I converted to propane use, back in 1981 (when gasoline
seemed about to double in price to $2)
The procedure is straightforward, as plumbing standards go, with main concerns
providing space for the regulator and fittings for the carburetor (in a
dual-fuel configuration), and designing around the clunky fuel tank, tho the
hurdle of getting a homebrew installation approved is formidable. The cost of
getting it installed commercially (~$3K) blows away any most budgets, beyond
having one's project butchered in the process. One must be very careful about
potential leaks with a flammable gas such as propane. Check about first to see
if there is a standard for getting your own installation approved by inspection
by a state CARB agency, for instance.
That being said, the operation of such a rig is rewarding, for the sake of the
aforementioned 10% discount that propane fuel enjoys compared to regular. It
should be discounted more: back in the '80's, propane as motor fuel was priced a
further 10% less than camper/grill fuel- that doesn't happen any more. I should
mention that milage on propane is mebbe 10% less, but the engine runs so sweet
and clean as oil contamination by carbon and unburnt fuel doesn't happen. I
seldom change the oil in my Ford, only add a quart as required, and the oil
filter seems good for a year at least. Engine wear is minute, proven by many
stationary engines running with minimal maintenance. Heavy road use means that
you should get newer hi-temp valve installed, as a gaseous fuel doesn't cool the
valves like gasoline does. For lighter recreation use, don't bother.
After 30 years, I have had to service the carb adaptor once, changed out one
fuel check valve for leakage, and tightened up fittings as required.
If you're still with me here, check online with www.ProPaneCarbs.com/ for more
info. He seems to have hardware and adaptors for any-sized engine, air or
water-cooled, and has been the most helpful, with good prices. I'm not
affiliated, just a satisfied customer. Hope this is useful. ;-}






Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:56 pm

casselp_2000
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #6470 of 6516 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

The point about using '70's & '80's engines works well for simplicity, ease of service, and Locost: the major concern is that of emissions standards. I have...
Philip Cassel
casselp_2000
Online Now Send Email
Jun 26, 2008
5:56 pm

Wow, $2/gallon. It's just about $10/gallon here in the UK... (£1.19/litre) and going up daily. James...
James Hughes
jnahughes
Offline Send Email
Jun 27, 2008
7:31 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help